Proposed New SS Card May Cause More Problems

Cited: Time

New York Democrat Chuck Schumer and South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham believe that a national identity card could resolve the heated debate over immigration reform.  Recently, they presented a blueprint of an immigration bill to President Barack Obama that included a proposal to issue a biometric ID card.  This ID card would contain various physical data such as fingerprints or even retinal scans and would be given to all working Americans.

The “enhanced Social Security card” is being touted as a way to curb illegal immigration by giving employers the power to quickly and accurately determine who is eligible to work. “If you say [illegal immigrants] can’t get a job when they come here, you’ll stop it,” Schumer told the Wall Street Journal. Proponents also hope legal hiring will be easier for employers if there’s a single go-to document instead of the 26 that new employees can currently use to show they’re authorized to work.

But with a congressional skirmish over comprehensive immigration reform on the horizon, skeptics from the left and the right have raised numerous concerns about the biometric ID — some of which pop up every time a form of national identification is proposed, and some that hinge on the shape this plan ultimately takes.

The sheer scale of the project is a potential problem, in terms of time, money and technology. The premise of using a biometric employment card (which would most likely contain fingerprint data) to stop illegal immigrants from working requires that all 150 million–plus American workers, not just immigrants, have one. Michael Cherry, president of identification-technology company Cherry Biometrics, says the accuracy of such large-scale biometric measuring hasn’t been proved. “What study have we done?” he says. “We just have a few assumptions.”

Schumer estimates that employers would have to pay up to $800 for card-reading machines, and many point out that compliance could prove burdensome for many small-to-medium-size businesses. In a similar program run by the Department of Homeland Security, in which 1.4 million transportation workers have been issued biometric credentials, applicants each pay $132.50 to help cover the costs of the initiative, which so far run in the hundreds of millions. “This is sort of like the worst combination of the DMV and the TSA,” says Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel for the ACLU, an organization that has traditionally opposed all forms of national ID. “It’s going to be enormously costly no matter what.”

For those who would rather think of something more enjoyable like music or movies . . . The number one choice for people who are in need of a Los Angeles CD and DVD replication, duplication, packaging and printing is only a click away.  This CD duplication company uses cutting-edge technology, which allows them to produce a significant amount of product on a daily basis. Due to the fact that they use state-of-the-art technology for Hollywood CD duplication, replication and packaging DVDs and CDs, they are able to avoid costly mistakes.

Lynden Melmed, former chief counsel for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, says the pace of expanding the program is crucial. He believes that issuing the cards on a rolling basis and viewing them as “the next version of the driver’s license” makes the idea of a nationally issued biometric ID seem much less daunting. “I think that there is a risk in overreaching too quickly,” he says.

Another potential issue is whether the card will result in people being wrongfully denied work. The average person isn’t equipped to determine whether two fingerprints are a match — even FBI fingerprint experts have their off days, as when they incorrectly implicated a Portland, Ore., attorney in the 2004 bombings in Madrid — which means employers would be relying on an automated system. And that, as well as the fingerprinting process itself, invariably leads to some small number of mistakes.

In testimony given at a Senate immigration hearing in July 2009, Illinois Representative Luis V. Gutierrez, who has led the drive for immigration reform in the House, pointed out that an error rate of just 1% would mean that more than 1.5 million people — roughly the population of Philadelphia — would be wrongly deemed ineligible for work. “This is no small number,” he said, “especially in this economy, where so many workers already face extraordinary obstacles to finding a job.” Dean Pradeep Khosla, founding director of Carnegie Mellon’s cybersecurity lab, estimates that the error rates of computerized systems would likely be less than 2% (and could be less than 1%) but says they can never be zero. Civil-liberties advocates, citing the secret post-9/11 no-fly lists that innocents couldn’t get their names removed from, worry about whether those mistakenly put on the no-job list will ever be given the chance to correct the information.

Many skeptics also worry about false positives that come not from the computer but from counterfeits or employers looking to bypass the system. “It’s naive to think that this document won’t be faked,” Calabrese says. “Folks are already paying $10,000 to sneak into the country. What’s a couple thousand more?” In a recent Washington Post op-ed, Schumer and Graham said the card would be “fraud-proof” and that employers would face “stiff fines” and possibly imprisonment if they tried to get around using it. But Cherry half-jokes that someone could falsify such an ID in 15 minutes, and Khosla says that while current technology makes fingerprints the most feasible biometric marker to use, they’re also one of the easiest to steal.

Lillie Coney, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, believes that keeping biometric information out of a centralized database is “the biggest challenge.” Otherwise, she says, the prospect of having millions of fingerprints on hand would be too tempting for the government not to abuse. In their op-ed, the Senators said the information would be stored only on the card.

Although the card is being presented as existing solely for determining employment eligibility, “it will be almost impossible to say that this wealth of information is there, but you can only use it for this purpose,” Coney says. “Privacy is pretty much hinged on the notion that if you collect data for one purpose, you can’t use it for another.” Calabrese expresses worries that this ID will become a “central identity document” that one will need in order to travel, vote or perhaps own a gun, which Melmed calls “mission creep.”

“People are waiting to see something in writing,” Calabrese says. “But the idea doesn’t fill people with a warm, fuzzy feeling.”  Because of general government mistrust many dismissed privacy concerns rather than legitimate technical issues.  Before the “social acceptance debate” over biometric cards can even begin, Melmed believes that the practical issues will have to be addressed first.  Both actually rely on details that the Senators have not yet presented.

————————————————————–

My Take: Isn’t this something the government has been trying to get in the works for years, a national ID?  Now they want to make it so that the card holds personal information?  I can just see the future, instead of needing iPod repair, people will need their Social Security card repaired.  Wait a minute that repair service will need to be certified by the federal government!  Or will we just have to go to Social Security office?

I suppose they will have to have Los Angeles data centers on the west coast and New York data centers on the East Coast dedicated to Social Security cards just to hold the information cards contained.  They will probably have a colocation as backup.  When the guy who does PlayStation repair will change his profession and start repairing Social Security cards.

But, it just might create jobs for load testing products and those products would be Social Security cards.  They will newly US software test to make sure that the software works roughly and they will need people to do that as well.

————————————————————–

Other Resources